European Solidarity and Holos unanimously did not take part in the voting.
In this way, the country intends to respond to information challenges in the war.
- Do we understand correctly that if the fakes are "pro-Western" - then "is this different"?
- It is possible that "button-pressing", which was like a talk of the town, and on which strangers were beaten very hard and not very hard of their own, will suddenly take over and stop. I do not rule out the possibility that deputies will be required to hand over one severed finger each and colleagues will carry a bunch in their pockets for identification.
- If it really was about an agreement between all and interested countries, subjects of this information market, then a new media law would be simply impossible. Real experts from the European Commission and the Rada of Europe are against new laws to regulate online media. So why are their Kyiv offices all in favor?
Cleansing supposedly propaganda media is not about sovereignty. These are deliberate sweeps for specific political groups
The lists of “wrong” media include only the opposition, the correct ones are those funded by the West
Knyazhitsky’s main emphasis is on the fact that the “EU” is wary of censorship, but not in the case of “anti-Ukrainian” media.
An unpopular bill may not get votes.
27 August 2020 11: 24
Tomilenko spoke out